Products such as FabricCache offer little functionality that SSDs in networked storage arrays cannot.
What they can and do bring to the table is lower latency and subsequent higher performance that comes with placing the PCIe SSD cards in the physical server -- as long as the application accessing the PCIe SSD is on the same server and does not have to traverse the storage area network.
Even then, it still will have lower latency because it does not have to go through a storage controller. Products of this type also have a lower initial investment and can be grown incrementally with smaller atomic units.
Editor's note: To learn more about how to choose the right flash implementation for your needs, read our two-part tip: Find the best spot for flash SSD storage.
To learn more about QLogic Corp.'s Mt. Rainier FabricCache, check out: QLogic Mt. Rainier FabricCache pools PCIe flash cache across servers.
Dig Deeper on Server-based SSD implementations
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Marc Staimer of Dragon Slayer Consulting explains what causes read disturbs and how flash vendors are mitigating the issue.continue reading
Marc Staimer of Dragon Slayer Consulting compares NVDIMM and memory channel flash, explaining the advantages and disadvantages of each.continue reading
Marc Staimer compares memory channel flash storage with PCIe connected flash and offers insight on the advantages and disadvantages of each.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.