Can you compare synchronous and asynchronous NAND in terms of price and performance? And what is each typically used for?
Synchronous and asynchronous NAND, based on spec sheets, look remarkably similar in performance. However, they aren't, and the differences are non-trivial.
Synchronous NAND utilizes both the rise and fall of the signal wave to move data, giving it a potential of more than twice the performance than asynchronous (analogous to double-data-rate DRAM or DDR). Real-world numbers prove a much lower difference that ranges from 10 to 100% better performance depending on application.
Synchronous NAND is more expensive than asynchronous. Sync NAND is used when performance is everything, such as with gaming systems.
Also, what is toggle-mode MLC and what is it typically used for?
Toggle-mode MLC is asynchronous NAND that is supposed to provide similar performance as synchronous NAND, but at a lower price. Independent testing has not verified these claims yet. Toggle-mode MLC is also known as double-data-rate asynchronous NAND.
Dig Deeper on Solid state storage technology
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Object storage has unique features, including erasure coding and multi-copy mirroring, which may make it better suited to data protection than more ...continue reading
Why would you attach NAND flash storage directly to the memory channel? Isn't RAM much faster than NAND? Marc Staimer discusses this and more in this...continue reading
Marc Staimer takes a closer look in this Expert Answer at how 3D NAND flash vendors keep bit rot from taking place, a vexing challenge given 3D NAND ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.