Will SATA and SAS SSDs likely continue to exist, filling different needs? Or is it more likely that one will overtake...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
SAS is a more robust interface than SATA, with dual ports and end-to-end data integrity. SATA is a cheaper interface. SAS SSDs are gaining in popularity because of that robustness and a narrowing of the price differences.
But this is the storage market. In the storage market, no interface technology ever really dies. It was not that long ago when ATA was thought to be on its last legs, and then SATA appeared. There are still storage products utilizing bus and tag, a 60-year-old technology. The storage market is risk-averse. There is no winner take all.
Editor's note: To learn more about SAS and SATA SSD adoption and other enterprise storage trends, check out: Storage tiers: SAS interface, MLC flash rising.
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Latency in object stores that stems from a large amount of metadata means the technology is better suited to non-transactional data.continue reading
Eventual consistency in object stores can be an issue because object storage is spread over many nodes and up-to-date data may not always be ...continue reading
HDD failure can put bytes of data at risk. Is multi-copy mirroring or erasure coding the more efficient data protection approach?continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.