Will SATA and SAS SSDs likely continue to exist, filling different needs? Or is it more likely that one will overtake...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
SAS is a more robust interface than SATA, with dual ports and end-to-end data integrity. SATA is a cheaper interface. SAS SSDs are gaining in popularity because of that robustness and a narrowing of the price differences.
But this is the storage market. In the storage market, no interface technology ever really dies. It was not that long ago when ATA was thought to be on its last legs, and then SATA appeared. There are still storage products utilizing bus and tag, a 60-year-old technology. The storage market is risk-averse. There is no winner take all.
Editor's note: To learn more about SAS and SATA SSD adoption and other enterprise storage trends, check out: Storage tiers: SAS interface, MLC flash rising.
Dig Deeper on SSD array implementations
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Why would you attach NAND flash storage directly to the memory channel? Isn't RAM much faster than NAND? Marc Staimer discusses this and more in this...continue reading
Marc Staimer takes a closer look in this Expert Answer at how 3D NAND flash vendors keep bit rot from taking place, a vexing challenge given 3D NAND ...continue reading
The suitability of triple-level cell (TLC) flash storage for enterprise use depends on whether applications are heavily read- or write-optimized. ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.