itestro - Fotolia
It's not easy. With memory technology, the systems can perform deduplication and/or compression a whole lot faster. There are more effective ways of implementing it in a flash environment when compared with a traditional spinning disk environment where there are a lot of synchronization issues to deal with.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
If I was making an investment from a vendor side, I wouldn't invest [much] into primary storage dedupe or compression for spinning disks. I would probably only offer those technologies for flash and embed them into the flash controllers as much as possible, so it wouldn't take processing cycles away from the storage controller. I think the return on the investment [for dedupe and compression] is higher for flash than for spinning disk.
That being said, there are a number of implementations that perform data reduction for spinning disks. Some perform it post-process, which is problematic in some cases, but it does increase the capacity. If the data doesn't have a high-reference usage, that's probably very adequate. Also, there are some implementations that perform data reduction inline, before it's actually written. Those are very effective.
The importance of primary storage dedupe
How primary storage deduplication impacts backup
Data dedupe for primary storage
Dig Deeper on SSD array implementations
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.